Shards of war quick flame new feature3/16/2023 ![]() More than 50,000,000 fragmentation grenades alone were manufactured by the United States for use in World War II. The grenade’s effectiveness in attacking enemy positions during the trench warfare of World War I led to its becoming a standard part of the combat infantryman’s equipment, which it has continued to be. Grenades did not come back into use on an important scale until the Russo-Japanese War (1904–05). After about 1750, grenades were virtually abandoned because the range and accuracy of firearms had increased, lessening the opportunities for close combat. They eventually became so important that specially selected soldiers in 17th-century European armies were trained as grenade throwers, or grenadiers ( see grenadier). Grenades came into use around the 15th century and were found to be particularly effective when exploded among enemy troops in the ditch of a fortress during an assault. The word grenade probably derived from the French word for pomegranate, because the bulbous shapes of early grenades resembled that fruit. Grenade, small explosive, chemical, or gas bomb that is used at short range. SpaceNext50 Britannica presents SpaceNext50, From the race to the Moon to space stewardship, we explore a wide range of subjects that feed our curiosity about space!.Learn about the major environmental problems facing our planet and what can be done about them! Saving Earth Britannica Presents Earth’s To-Do List for the 21st Century.Britannica Beyond We’ve created a new place where questions are at the center of learning.100 Women Britannica celebrates the centennial of the Nineteenth Amendment, highlighting suffragists and history-making politicians.COVID-19 Portal While this global health crisis continues to evolve, it can be useful to look to past pandemics to better understand how to respond today.Student Portal Britannica is the ultimate student resource for key school subjects like history, government, literature, and more.This Time in History In these videos, find out what happened this month (or any month!) in history.#WTFact Videos In #WTFact Britannica shares some of the most bizarre facts we can find.Demystified Videos In Demystified, Britannica has all the answers to your burning questions.Britannica Explains In these videos, Britannica explains a variety of topics and answers frequently asked questions.Britannica Classics Check out these retro videos from Encyclopedia Britannica’s archives.And even without the handicap, they are still far better at getting through S#$ by raw chopping/force transfer caused deformation and trauma instead of material tension due to point of leverage.Īlso pikes and certain halberds were for horses (with maces and staves and some polearm heads were for blunt force unless you mean trying a mordhau with a zweihander), the big swords were anti formation and formation holder weapons (break through pike lines or mobs for army to not get tarpitted when cavalry flanking aint a option and prevent breakthroughs on tactical positions by multiple opponents). Ignoring that its not about physics but weapon category and design choice (and that broken war is you sticking a metal-sentient shard with only bits of energy into people vs bludgeoning people with energy waves), greatswords due to metallurgy and resources were better cutting weapons than katanas when period compared and. Higher base damage and heavy attk damage. War has stats higher that Broken War too remember. It can still slice through things but not as much as bludgeon them. Greatswords were designed to knock people of horses and for blunt force damage. Katana will slice through things as its lighter and sharper, built for close quarters combat. Its like comparing a Katana to a Greatsword in real life. War is bigger and thus heavier than Broken War. I'm guessing "Shard of War" is some weirdly translated version of the sword Broken War? In fact, transfer the critical chance from the shard of war to the war, and change the impact damage in the war - to the advantage of the slash damage. So the same with crit, why the chance of a critical hit for a shard of war is higher if it is part of a HALF war. Although the shard of war is a PART of the war, and in fact, with the second part - the war should have the status of slash the advantage of the part of logic. When there is a war, it has mostly impact damage. I wonder why shard of war (in fact has predominantly slash status).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |